Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2018, Page: 23-31
The Influence on Academic Performance of Working Group Methodology
Icíar Carmen Jiménez Barandalla, Department of Business Economy, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
José Luis Montes Botella, Department of Applied Economics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
Paloma Bernal Turnes, Department of Business Economy, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
Received: Feb. 13, 2018;       Accepted: May 8, 2018;       Published: May 24, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20180302.11      View  1638      Downloads  128
The Working Group Methodology has positive effects on students’ academic performance. The contribution of this study consists in determining the variables by means of which the Working Group Methodology influences academic performance, and in comparing the effectiveness of two different working group methodologies: cooperative learning (hereafter CL) and group work without guidelines established by the teacher, known as the Unstructured Groups Methodology (hereafter UGM). To that end, the effect of Working Group Methodology on academic performance is measured using three factors: 1) student attitudes; 2) attitude to learning and the learning approach adopted by students; and 3) student skills. The sample is made up of 110 students from a Spanish university, working on the Corporate Finance module of a degree in Business Administration and Management. Based on the analysis of Structural Equation Modeling the conclusion is reached that only the CL methodology affects academic performance, and that it does so via student skills; its influence via the attitude to learning and the learning approach of the student is also debated. In addition, it can be seen that CL influences student attitudes and skills in a more significant way than UGM. Finally, the results show that the variables in the model account for academic performance to a greater extent in the group in which CL was used (R2=0.264) than in the group in which UGM was applied (R2=0.187). These results demonstrate the greater effectiveness of group work when based on well-defined guidelines, rather than when developed without a predefined structure.
Academic Performance, Working Group, Cooperative Learning, Skills, Attitudes, Learning Approach
To cite this article
Icíar Carmen Jiménez Barandalla, José Luis Montes Botella, Paloma Bernal Turnes, The Influence on Academic Performance of Working Group Methodology, Higher Education Research. Vol. 3, No. 2, 2018, pp. 23-31. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20180302.11
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., and Whitelock, D. (2018). Overcoming cross-cultural group work tensions: Mixed student perspectives on the role of social relationships. Higher Education, 75(1), 149-166. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0131-3
Lavy, S. (2017). Who benefits from group work in higher education? An attachment theory perspective. Higher Education, 73(2), 175-187. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0006-z
Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445. doi:10.3102/00346543052003421
Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1999). What makes cooperative learning work. In D. Kluge, S. McGuire, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson (Eds.), Cooperative learning (pp. 23-36). Tokio: Japan Association for Language Teaching.
Stahl, G. (2012) Traversing planes of learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 467-473. doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9159-7
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Holubec, E. J. (1999). Los nuevos círculos del aprendizaje. La cooperación en el aula y la escuela [The new circles of learning. Cooperation in the classroom and school]. Buenos Aires: Aiqué.
Brown, A. (1994) Group Work. Great Yarmouth: Ashgate Publishing.
Handy, C. B. (1983). Understanding organizations. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books Ltd.
Crow, L. D. and Crow, A. (1969). Adolescent development and adjustment. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., and Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47(2), 161-176. doi:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016443.43594.d1
Dockery, T. M., and Bedeian, A. G. (1988). “Attitudes versus actions”: LaPiere's (1934) Classic study revisited. Social Behavior and Personality, 17(1), 9-16. doi:10.2224/sbp.1989.17.1.9
Pérez, M. V., Valenzuela, M., Díaz, A., González-Pienda, J. A., and Núñez, J. C. (2013). Dificultades de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios de primer año [Learning difficulties in college freshmen]. Atenea, 508, 135-150. doi:10.4067/S0718-04622013000200010
Brown, P., Green, A., and Lauder, H. (2001). High Skills. Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Woods, D. R., Felder, R. M., Rugarcia, A., and Stice, J. E. (2000). The future of Engineering education III. Developing critical skills. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(2), 108-117. Retrieved from: http://www.che.ufl.edu/cee/
Lovelace, M., and Brickman, P. (2013). Best practices for measuring students’ attitudes toward learning science. CBE-Life Sciences Education 12(4), 606-617. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-11-019
Shaoan, X. I. E. (2013). Research on students’ study condition and psychology for interactive teaching model in the university. Psychology Research, 13, 1838 - 658X. doi:10.5503/J.PR.2013.13.002
Gardner, R. C., and MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language learning, 43(2), 157-194. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00714.x
Heikkilä, A., Niemivirta, M., Nieminen, J., and Lonka, K. (2011). Interrelations among university students' approaches to learning, regulation of learning, and cognitive and attributional strategies: A person oriented approach. Higher Education, 61(5), 513-529. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2
Booth, K. M., and James, B. W. (2001). Interactive learning in a higher education Level 1 mechanics module. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 955-967. doi:10.1080/09500690119817
Tran, D. V., and Lewis. R. R. (2012). Effects of cooperative learning on students at a Giang university in Vietnam. International Education Studies, 5(1), 86-99. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n1p86
Bailey, J., Sass, M., Swiercz, P. M., Seal, C., and Kayes, D. C. (2005). Teaching with and through teams: Student-written, instructor-facilitated case writing and the signatory code. Journal of Management Education, 29(1), 39-59. doi:10.1177/1052562904269641
López, C., and Real, J. C. (2017). Efectos de la aplicación de "jigsaw" sobre la adquisición de competencias en dirección de operaciones. Revista De Métodos Cuantitativos Para La Economía y La Empresa, 24, 220-249. Retrieved from https://vpnssl.urjc.es/dana/home/index.cgi/docview/2013608402?accountid=14730
Jordan, D., and Le Metaias, J. (1997). Social skilling through cooperative learning. Educational Research, 39(1), 3-21. doi:10.1080/0013188970390101
Whicker, K. M., Bol, L., and Nunerery, J. A. (1997). Cooperative learning in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(1), 42-48. doi:10.1080/00220679709597519
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
Hänze, M. and Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 29-4. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. The Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256-272. doi:10.1080/00221309.2010.484448
Mamat, N. J. Z., and Mazelan, F. F. (2011). Learning encouragement factors and academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 307-315. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.044
Kesici, S., Sahin, I., and Akturk, H. O. (2009). Analysis of cognitive learning strategies and computer attitudes, according to college students’ gender and locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 529-534. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.004
Credé, M., and Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425-454. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology 61(3), 265-275. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
Teachman, J. D. (1996). Intellectual Skill and Academic Performance: Do Families Bias the Relationship? Sociology of Education, 69(1), 35-48. doi:10.2307/2112722
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0.M3. Hamburg. Retrieved from: www.smartpls.de
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20, 277-320. doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Entwistle, N. J., and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg, and L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Geffen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural Equations Models and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. In Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 4, Article 7 (pp. 1-79). doi:10.2307/3250956
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., and Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Interclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumption. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25-33. doi:10.1177/001316447403400104
Vallet-Bellmunt, T., Rivera-Torres, P., Vallet-Bellmunt, I., and Vallet-Bellmunt, A. (2017). Aprendizaje cooperativo, aprendizaje percibido y rendimiento académico en la enseñanza del marketing. Educación XX1, 20(1). doi:10.5944/educxx1.17512
Lobato, C., Apodaca, P. M., Barandiarán, M. C., San José, M. J., Sancho, J. and Zubimendi, J. L. (2010). Development of the competences of teamwork through cooperative learning at the university. International Journal of Information and Operations Management Education, 3(3), 224-240. doi: 10.1504/IJIOME.2010.033547
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
Webb, L. D., and Brigman, G. A. (2006). Student success skills: Tools and strategies for improved academic and social outcomes. Professional School Counseling, 10(2), 112-120. Retrieved from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ767362
Browse journals by subject