Volume 2, Issue 2, April 2017, Page: 60-75
Investigating the Relationship Between Intergenerational Income Mobility and Higher Education: Comparison Among Urban, Rural and Migrants Groups in Contemporary China
Jian Li, Education Leadership and Policy Studies, School of Education, Indianan University, Bloomington, U. S. A
Received: Feb. 4, 2017;       Accepted: Feb. 20, 2017;       Published: Mar. 3, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.her.20170202.16      View  2028      Downloads  128
Intergenerational income equality involves in the intergenerational mobility. Moreover, higher education is always considered as key elements to stimulate intergenerational mobility. Thus, the ultimate goal of this study is to examine the relationship between intergenerational income mobility and higher education for three major groups, including urban residents, rural residents, and rural-urban migrants from a political economic perspective. Theoretically speaking, interactive autonomy-based Political Economic Theory has been utilized to elaborate the rationales of social and education stratification and solidification that implicitly impact the intergenerational income mobility for rural, urban and migrants’ families in contemporary China. Moreover, the findings from this study suggested that urban higher income group and rural higher income groups are significantly influenced by children’s length of education. In addition, father’s income has significantly impact on children’s income for urban higher income group, urban low-income group, rural high-income group, and rural low-income group. Moreover, father’s length of education has directly impact on children’s length of education for most of groups. Furthermore, father’s length of education has significant impact on father’s income for all groups. Additionally, based on the results from this study, relevant policy recommendations and suggestions have been provided to eliminate the gaps between intergenerational mobility and inequality of education access.
Intergenerational Income Mobility, Rural-Urban Migrants, Higher Education, Social Stratification
To cite this article
Jian Li, Investigating the Relationship Between Intergenerational Income Mobility and Higher Education: Comparison Among Urban, Rural and Migrants Groups in Contemporary China, Higher Education Research. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 60-75. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20170202.16
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Xu, X. (2001). Changes in the Chinese social structure as seen from occupational prestige ratings and job preferences. Social Sciences in China (2), 62-76.
Chen X. (1999). Cost Compensation of China’s Higher Education. Doctoral thesis, School of Education, Peking University, China.
Guo, C., & Min, W. (2008). Education and intergenerational income mobility in urban China. Frontiers of Education in China, 3 (1), 22-44.
Solon G (1992). Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. the American Economic Review, (3): 393–408.
Elizabeth H. P. (1992). Patterns of intergenerational mobility in income and earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74 (3): 456–466.
Couch, A. K., Lillard, R. D. (1998). Sample selection rules and the intergenerational correlation of earnings. Labor Economics, 5 (3): 313–329.
Corak M., Heisz A. (1999). The intergenerational earnings and income mobility of Canadian men evidence from longitudinal income tax data. Journal of Human Resources, 34 (3): 504–533.
Aughinbaugh A. (2000). Reapplication and extension intergenerational mobility in the United States. Labor Economics, 7 (6): 785–796.
Björklund, A., & Jäntti, M. (1997). Intergenerational income mobility in Sweden compared to the United States. The American Economic Review, 87 (5), 1009-1018.
Solon G. (2002). Cross country differences in intergenerational earnings mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (3): 59–66.
Dearden, L., Machin, S., & Reed, H. (1997). Intergenerational mobility in Britain. The Economic Journal, 47-66.
Levine D. I., Mazumder B. (2002). Choosing the Right Parents: Changes in the Intergenerational Transmission of Inequality Between 1980 and the Early 1990s. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, August.
Nam Y. (2004). Is America becoming more equal for children changes in the intergenerational transmission of low- and high income status?. Social Science Research, 33 (2): 187–205.
Fuchs, C., & Collier, J. (2007). A dynamic systems view of economic and political theory. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 23-52.
Benjamin, D., L. Brandt, and J. Giles. 2005. The evolution of income inequality in rural China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53 (4): 769–824.
Yang, D. (2002). What has caused regional inequality in China? China Economic Review, 13 (4): 331–334.
Lin, J., and P. Liu. (2005). Development strategies and regional income disparities in China. Working Paper Series No. E2005005. Beijing: China Center for Economic Research.
Demurger, S., J. Sachs, W. Woo, S. Bao, G. Chang, and A. Mellinger. (2002). Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China. NBER Working Paper No. 8897. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Von Foerster, Heinz. (1960). ‘On Self-Organizing Systems and Their Environments’, in Heinz von Foerster, Cybernetics of Cybernetics. Minneapolis: Future Systems, 220-230.
Luhmann, Niklas. (1988). ‘Das Ende der alteuropäischen Politik’, in Maurice Weyembergh and Jean-Marc Piret (eds.). La fin du politique. Brüssel: Vrije Univ., 249-257.
Dunsire, A. (1996). ‘Tipping the Balance. Autopoiesis and Governance’, Administration and Society, 28:3, 299-334.
Little, J. H. (2001). ‘Autopoiesis and Governance: Societal Steering and Control in Democratic Societies’, in Felix Geyer and Johannes van der Zouwen (eds.). Complexity, Autopoiesis, and Observation of Social Systems. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kickert, W. J. (1993). Autopoiesis and the science of (public) administration: Essence, sense and nonsense. Organization Studies, 14 (2), 261-278.
Kickert, W. J. (1993). Complexity, governance and dynamics: conceptual explorations of public network management. Modern governance, 191-204.
Willke, H. (1989). Systemtheorie entwickelter Gesellschaften: Dynamik und Riskanz moderner gesellschaftlicher Selbstorganisation. Juventa-Verlag.
Willke, H. (2014). Systemtheorie III: Steuerungstheorie. UTB GmbH.
Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2016). Statistics for business & economics. Nelson Education.
Renard, M. F. (2002). A pessimistic view on the impact of regional inequalities. China Economic Review, 13 (4), 341-344.
Lu, D. (2002). Rural-urban income disparity: Impact of growth, allocative efficiency, and local growth welfare. China Economic Review, 13 (4): 419–429.
Anders B, Chadwick L (2003). Intergenerational income mobility in permanent and separated families. Economics Letters, (80): 239–246.
Anders B, Jantti M (1997). Intergenerational income mobility in Sweden compared to the United States. The American Economic Review, 87 (5): 1009–1018.
Chadwick L, Solon G (2002). Intergenerational income mobility among daughters. The American Economic Review, 92 (1): 335–344.
Das M, Sjogren T (2002). The inter-generational link in income mobility evidence from adoptions. Economics Letter, 75 (1): 55–60.
Guo C., Ding X. (2004). Labor market segmentation and role of education in occupational intergenerational effect. Economics, (4): 24–28.
Liu, Y. (2004). Development of the rural health insurance system in China. Health Policy and Planning, 19 (3): 159–165.
Browse journals by subject